MACHINE LEARNING-BASED PREDICTION OF METAL OXIDE NANOPARTICLE TOXICITY USING PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND EXPOSUREDEPENDENT PARAMETERS

Authors

  • Dr. Nilesh Anantha Subramanian
  • Prof. Ashok Palaniappan
  • Dr. Yaswanth Sai Nukavarapu

Abstract

Metal oxide nanoparticles are widely used in pharmaceutical, biomedical, environmental, and industrial applications; however, their potential toxicity remains an important safety concern. This study evaluated the toxicity of selected metal oxide nanoparticles using physicochemical, chemical, exposure-dependent, and machine learning-based approaches. The analysis included five nanoparticles: Al₂O₃, CuO, Fe₂O₃, TiO₂, and ZnO. Variables considered included nanoparticle type, core size, hydrodynamic size, surface charge, surface area, exposure time, dosage, chemical/electronic descriptors, number of oxygen atoms, and toxicity class. A total of 881 observations were analyzed, of which 476 were toxic and 405 were non-toxic. Nanoparticle-wise analysis showed that CuO and ZnO had stronger toxic tendencies, while TiO₂, Al₂O₃, and Fe₂O₃ were mostly or completely associated with non-toxic outcomes. Toxic observations were generally associated with higher core size, positive surface charge, higher dosage, and longer exposure time. Machine learning models, including Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting, were applied for toxicity classification. Gradient Boosting achieved the best performance with 91.6% accuracy, 83.5% F1-score, and 0.976 ROC-AUC, followed closely by Random Forest. Feature importance analysis identified dosage as the most influential predictor of toxicity. Overall, the findings suggest that ensemble-based machine learning models can support preliminary in silico nanotoxicity screening and safer metal oxide nanoparticle design.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadi, M., Ayyoubzadeh, S. M., & Ghorbani-Bidkorpeh, F. (2024). Toxicity prediction of nanoparticles using

machine learning approaches. Toxicology, 501, 153697.

Augustine, R., Hasan, A., Primavera, R., Wilson, R. J., Thakor, A. S., & Kevadiya, B. D. (2020). Cellular uptake and

retention of nanoparticles: Insights on particle properties and interaction with cellular components. Materials Today

Communications, 25, 101692.

Banaye Yazdipour, A., Masoorian, H., Ahmadi, M., Mohammadzadeh, N., & Ayyoubzadeh, S. M. (2023). Predicting

the toxicity of nanoparticles using artificial intelligence tools: a systematic review. Nanotoxicology, 17(1), 62-77.

Baranowska-Wójcik, E., Szwajgier, D., Oleszczuk, P., & Winiarska-Mieczan, A. (2020). Effects of titanium dioxide

nanoparticles exposure on human health—a review. Biological trace element research, 193(1), 118-129.

Chandrakala, V., Aruna, V., & Angajala, G. (2022). Review on metal nanoparticles as nanocarriers: current challenges

and perspectives in drug delivery systems. Emergent Materials, 5(6), 1593-1615.

Choi, J. S., Ha, M. K., Trinh, T. X., Yoon, T. H., & Byun, H. G. (2018). Towards a generalized toxicity prediction

model for oxide nanomaterials using integrated data from different sources. Scientific reports, 8(1), 6110.

Forest, V. (2022). Experimental and computational nanotoxicology—Complementary approaches for nanomaterial

hazard assessment. Nanomaterials, 12(8), 1346.

Forest, V., Hochepied, J. F., & Pourchez, J. (2019). Importance of choosing relevant biological end points to predict

nanoparticle toxicity with computational approaches for human health risk assessment. Chemical research in

toxicology, 32(7), 1320-1326.

Fujihara, J., & Nishimoto, N. (2024). Review of zinc oxide nanoparticles: toxicokinetics, tissue distribution for various

exposure routes, toxicological effects, toxicity mechanism in mammals, and an approach for toxicity

reduction. Biological trace element research, 202(1), 9-23.

Furxhi, I., Murphy, F., Poland, C. A., Sheehan, B., Mullins, M., & Mantecca, P. (2019). Application of Bayesian

networks in determining nanoparticle-induced cellular outcomes using transcriptomics. Nanotoxicology, 13(6), 827-

Ha, M. K., Trinh, T. X., Choi, J. S., Maulina, D., Byun, H. G., & Yoon, T. H. (2018). Toxicity classification of oxide

nanomaterials: effects of data gap filling and PChem score-based screening approaches. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 3141.

Ibrahim Khan, K. S., & Khan, I. (2019). Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities. Arabian journal of

chemistry, 12(7), 908-931.

Jeevanandam, J., Barhoum, A., Chan, Y. S., Dufresne, A., & Danquah, M. K. (2018). Review on nanoparticles and

nanostructured materials: history, sources, toxicity and regulations. Beilstein journal of nanotechnology, 9(1), 1050-

Jha, S. K., Yoon, T. H., & Pan, Z. (2018). Multivariate statistical analysis for selecting optimal descriptors in the

toxicity modeling of nanomaterials. Computers in biology and medicine, 99, 161-172.

Kose, O., Stalet, M., Leclerc, L., & Forest, V. (2020). Influence of the physicochemical features of TiO 2 nanoparticles

on the formation of a protein corona and impact on cytotoxicity. RSC advances, 10(72), 43950-43959.

Mitchell, M. J., Billingsley, M. M., Haley, R. M., Wechsler, M. E., Peppas, N. A., & Langer, R. (2021). Engineering

precision nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nature reviews drug discovery, 20(2), 101-124.

Nikolova, M. P., & Chavali, M. S. (2020). Metal oxide nanoparticles as biomedical materials. Biomimetics, 5(2), 27.

Patra, J. K., Das, G., Fraceto, L. F., Campos, E. V. R., Rodriguez-Torres, M. D. P., Acosta-Torres, L. S., ... & Shin, H.

S. (2018). Nano based drug delivery systems: recent developments and future prospects. Journal of

nanobiotechnology, 16(1), 71.

Sajjad, H., Sajjad, A., Haya, R. T., Khan, M. M., & Zia, M. (2023). Copper oxide nanoparticles: In vitro and in vivo

toxicity, mechanisms of action and factors influencing their toxicology. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology

Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology, 271, 109682.

Shabbir, S., Kulyar, M. F. E. A., Bhutta, Z. A., Boruah, P., & Asif, M. (2021). Toxicological consequences of titanium

dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2NPs) and their jeopardy to human population. Bionanoscience, 11(2), 621-632.

Shin, S. W., Song, I. H., & Um, S. H. (2015). Role of physicochemical properties in nanoparticle

toxicity. Nanomaterials, 5(3), 1351-1365.

Subramanian, N. A., & Palaniappan, A. (2021). NanoTox: development of a parsimonious in silico model for toxicity

assessment of metal-oxide nanoparticles using physicochemical features. ACS omega, 6(17), 11729-11739.

Sukhanova, A., Bozrova, S., Sokolov, P., Berestovoy, M., Karaulov, A., & Nabiev, I. (2018). Dependence of

nanoparticle toxicity on their physical and chemical properties. Nanoscale research letters, 13(1), 44.

UCI Machine Learning. (2024). Nanoparticle toxicity dataset. Kaggle. Retrieved May 12, 2026, from

https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/ucimachinelearning/nanoparticle-toxicity-dataset

Yetisgin, A. A., Cetinel, S., Zuvin, M., Kosar, A., & Kutlu, O. (2020). Therapeutic nanoparticles and their targeted

delivery applications. Molecules, 25(9), 2193.

Zhang, N., Xiong, G., & Liu, Z. (2022). Toxicity of metal-based nanoparticles: Challenges in the nano era. Frontiers

in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 10, 1001572.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-28

How to Cite

Anantha Subramanian, D. N., Palaniappan, P. A., & Sai Nukavarapu, D. Y. (2025). MACHINE LEARNING-BASED PREDICTION OF METAL OXIDE NANOPARTICLE TOXICITY USING PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND EXPOSUREDEPENDENT PARAMETERS. International Journal For Research In Biology & Pharmacy, 11(3), 01–08. Retrieved from https://bp.gpubjournal.com/index.php/bp/article/view/2513